Wednesday, February 2, 2011

Vincent van Gogh - Portrait of the Artist (1889)

Artist:

Vincent Van Gogh


(March 30, 1853 - July 29, 1890)

Ds. Theodorus van Gogh, since 1849 pastor in Groot-Zundert, marries Anna Cornelia Carbentus. March 30, 1852 their 1st son Vincent Van Gogh is born (but is stillborn). Anna is severely depressed but one year later gives birth to a 2nd son March 30, 1853 Vincent Willem van Gogh in the small village of Groot-Zundert, Holland. With Anna still suffering from depression, Vincent and his mother never developed a close bond. Vincent never lived up to the perfect angel image of his older brother whom he was named after. Anna did give birth to 5 more children (3 sisters – Anna, Elisabeth & Willemina & 2 brothers – Theodorus & Cornelis) all of whom felt a connection with their mother.

(The Van Gogh's - Father Theo & Mother Anna, Children: Vincent, Anna, Theo, Elisabeth, Willemina & Cornelis)


Vincent’s family began suffering from financial difficulties and at 16 years old, in 1869, Vincent started an apprenticeship with his “Uncle Cent” at the art dealership Goupil & Cie at The Hague. Vincent was exposed to all forms, styles and qualities of art and learned to distinguish good art from bad art. His work required travel and exposed him to art in Holland, Belgium, Paris and London. 1873 Vincent’s brother Theo begins an apprenticeship with the art dealer and Vincent begins working for the Goupil branch in London. While in London, Vincent moves into the house of Ursula Loyer and her daughter Eugenie in Brixton. Vincent falls in love with Eugenine, and requests her hand in marriage. She declines but Vincent continues to pursue her. The rejection of another woman causes turmoil for Vincent and he begins to become hostile with the people he comes into contact with. After behaving abrasively toward his colleagues and clients and showing little interest in his work, in March 1876, Vincent is asked to resign from Groupil’s.

Vincent is a very learned man, he knows 4 languages and is very well read and decides to follow his fathers’ footsteps and become a clergyman. Vincent moves to England to study and prepare for entrance to the Evangelical College in Laeken, near Brussels. In December 1878 Vincent fails the entrance exams, he refused to learn the required Latin Language as he said it was a dead language and the poor did not speak it. Still with a desire to preach he asks the evangelical committee to be considered for service in the Borniage, a coal-mining district in Belgum. He was accepted for a 6 month trial period. The conditions in the Borniage were extremely bad, Vincent read the bible to the miners and he lived in complete poverty. In his zeal he gave away his own worldly goods to the poor and was dismissed for his literal interpretation of Christ's teaching. In August 1879. Vincent’s service contract was not renewed.

After a long period of soul searching in the Borinage, Vincent had been etching, and sketching in his free time. Van Gogh resolved to become an artist. His parents could not go along with this latest change of course, and Vincent turned to his brother Theo for financial support. In October 1880 Vincent enrolls in a beginners art course at an academy in Brussels; he undertakes some formal studies of anatomy and perspective.

(widowed cousin Kee)

Then, Vincent goes back to live with his parents in Etten where he falls in love with his widowed cousin, Kee Vos-Stricker. She rejects him and goes home to her family, but Vincent follows. The rejection from Kee, as well as with his own father, Vincents mental state begins to deteriorate.

(Sketch of Sien)

Vincent meets a woman of the streets, Clasina Maria Hoornik, known as Sien. She has a 5 yr old daughter, infected with gonorrhea and is pregnant with another mans child. Vincent and Sien move in together, and Vincent finally finds someone to love. Sien and her child model for Vincent as he experiments with oils. Vincent ends up in the hospital with gonorrhea. Theo and Vincent’s family disapprove of the relationship with Sien and Theo threatens to cut off his financial support unless their relationship ends. Sien ends up back working the streets, and Vincent finally ends the relationship.

After the death of Vincent’s Father and In keeping with his humanitarian outlook Vincent painted peasants and workers, the most famous picture from this period being The Potato Eaters (Van Gogh Museum, Amsterdam; 1885). Of this he wrote to Theo: `I have tried to emphasize that those people, eating their potatoes in the lamp-light have dug the earth with those very hands they put in the dish, and so it speaks of manual labor, and how they have honestly earned their food'.

February 1886 he moved to Paris and stayed with his brother Theo who was working at an art gallery there. It was in Paris he met some of the Impressionists: Camille Pissarro, Edgar Degas, Georges Surat, Claude Monet and painter Paul Gauguin. His painting underwent a violent metamorphosis under the combined influence of Impressionism and Japanese woodcuts, Van Gogh became obsessed by the symbolic and expressive values of colors and began to use them for this purpose rather than, as did the Impressionists, for the reproduction of visual appearances, atmosphere, and light. `Instead of trying to reproduce exactly what I have before my eyes,' he wrote, `I use color more arbitrarily so as to express myself more forcibly'.

In February 1888 van Gogh settled at Arles, where he lived in a “yellow house” and painted more than 200 canvases in 15 months. During this time he sold no pictures, was living in poverty, and suffered recurrent nervous crisis with hallucinations and depression. He became enthusiastic for the idea of founding an artists' co-operative at Arles and towards the end of the year his friend Paul Gauguin joined him as a roommate.

(Photo of artist Paul Gauguin)

Vincent’s brother Theo offered Gauguin a small sum of money to keep watch over Vincent and his mental state. Vincent and Gauguin had a turbulent relationship. After a quarrel on December 23, 1888 Vincent threatens Gauguin’s life with a razor blade, Van Gogh turns the blade on himself and cuts off part of his left ear lobe. The lobe is then wrapped in newspaper and Vincent presents it to a prostitute at the local brothel he frequented. He is dripping in blood and ends up hospitalized until early January. This event is commemorated in his Self-Portrait with Bandaged Ear (Courtauld Institute, London).

Vincent’s mental state fluctuates wildly at times, and he suffers from hallucinations and delusions. He continued to work from the Yellow House until he made the decision to have himself committed into an asylum at St Rémy, near Arles. During the year he spent there he produced many of his most famous paintings such as Starry Night (Museum of Modern Art, NY). He had a vast collection of drawings, sketches, and paintings (over 150).


(Johanna Van Gogh and Vincent Willhem)


In 1889 Theo married Johanna and the two had a son which was named Vincent Willhem. In May 1890 van Gogh moved to Auvers-sur-Oise to be near Theo, lodging with Dr Paul Gachet. There followed another tremendous burst of strenuous activity, but his spiritual anguish and depression became more acute. Theo and his wife began experiencing financial difficulties and their new son had ill health, Vincent fears he is responsible for his brothers troubles. On July 27, 1890, Vincent went out to the cornfields with a pistol and attempted to end his life. However,

Vincent did not die he was merely wounded from a self-inflicted bullet wound to the chest. Later that evening Vincent stumbled back to the house and Dr. Gachet cleaned his wounds and let him smoke his pipe. The Dr. called Theo, and the two brothers spent the evening of July 28 talking together in the bedroom. Sitting up in bed smoking his pipe with his brother at his side. Near the end, Theo climbed into bed with Vincent and cradles his head in his arms. Vincent says, “I wish I could pass away like this.” And he does just that, Vincent died in his brother Theo’s arms in the morning of July 29 1890.

He was buried at the cemetery of Auvers-sur-Oise, his coffin was covered with dozens of sunflowers, which he loved so much. Theo, unable to come to terms with his brother's death died 6 months later and was buried next to him.

Theo’s widow Johanna, returned to Holland and dedicated herself to getting her brother in law the recognition he deserved. She published the correspondence between Vincent and Theo (over 800 letters) and collected the artwork that had been scattered around Europe. Vincent produced some 900 paintings and 1100 drawings during a period of 10 years. Vincent van Gogh's mother threw away quite a number of his paintings during Vincent's life and even after his death. But she would live long enough to see her son become a world famous painter.

Feeling rejection by his mother, god and having several disastrous attempts to find happiness with a woman over the years. His work, all of it produced during a period of only 10 years, hauntingly conveys through its striking color, coarse brushwork, and contoured forms the anguish of a man suffering from mental illness. Vincent van Gogh is generally considered the greatest Dutch painter after Rembrandt. Though he had little success during his lifetime. It would not take long before his fame grew higher and higher. Large exhibitions were organized soon: Paris 1901, Amsterdam 1905, Cologne 1912, New York 1913 and Berlin 1914.



Vincent’s Technique:

o Vincent would squirt paint directly onto the canvas. So his paintings were very textured.

o Every brush stroke made was not merely a deposit of color, but an incisive graphic gesture.

o To Van Gogh it was the color, not the form, that determined the expressive content of his pictures. In the letters he wrote to his brother there are many eloquent descriptions of his choice of hues and the emotional meanings he attached to them.

o He used so much paint he would often go without eating so he could pay for more paint.

o It is believed that Vincent suffered from lead poisoning from nibbling at paint chips, one of the symptoms is swelling of the retinas causing one to see light in circles like halos aro

und objects (Starry Night)

o he also was noted that he would swallow paint and drink kerosene

o Some consider his paintings as the beginning of Expressionism – painting for an emotional effect.


ThePainting:


‘Portrait de l'artiste’ Self-Portrait (1889)


Type: Painting, Oil on Canvas

Dimensions: H. 65; W. 54.5 cm

Date: September 1889

In this head-and-shoulders view, the artist is wearing a suit and not the pea jacket he usually worked in. Attention is focused on the face. His features are hard and emaciated, his green-rimmed eyes seem intransigent and anxious. The dominant color, a mix of absinth green and pale turquoise finds a counterpoint in its complementary color, the fiery orange of the beard and hair. The model's immobility contrasts with the undulating hair and beard, echoed and amplified in the hallucinatory arabesques of the background. This portrait expresses a man haunted with inner anguish. A mass of writhing, curling brushstrokes, remind us of the sea in color and movement. Restless and tormented lines carry into the artist’s jacket and shirt but there are straighter, more controlled strokes in the head, as if he were hanging onto some shred of sanity in a world gone completely mad.

Vincent van Gogh often used himself as a model; he produced over forty-three self-portraits, paintings or drawings in ten years. Van Gogh used portrait painting as a method of introspection, a method to make money and a method of developing his skills as an artist. Van Gogh did not have money to pay models to pose for portraits nor did he have many people commissioning him to do portraits, so Van Gogh painted his own portrait.

Van Gogh did not see portrait painting as merely a means to an end; he also believed that portrait painting would help him develop his skills as an artist. Like the old masters, he observed himself critically in a mirror. Painting oneself is not an innocuous act: it is a questioning which often leads to an identity crisis. In a letter to his brother Theo dated September 16, 1888, Van Gogh writes about a self-portrait he painted and dedicated to his friend and fellow artist Paul Gauguin, “I purposely bought a mirror good enough to enable me to work from my image in default of a model, because if I can manage to paint the coloring of my own head, which is not to be done without some difficulty, I shall likewise be able to paint the heads of other good souls, men and women.”

He wrote to his sister: "I am looking for a deeper likeness than that obtained by a photographer." And later to his brother: "People say, and I am willing to believe it, that it is hard to know yourself. But it is not easy to paint yourself, either. The portraits painted by Rembrandt are more than a view of nature, they are more like a revelation".


This self portrait is one of over 150 paintings Van Gogh painted in the year (May 1889 - May 1890) he was staying at Saint-Paul de Mausole,
the asylum near Saint Rémy, Southern France:

Van Goghs Room at the asylum



Current Location:



Musée d’Orsay

Paris, France, Europe

History of Ownership

Gifted by Vincent to Doctor Paul Gachet, Auvers-sur-Oise

jusqu'en 1949, dans la collection Paul et Marguerite Gachet, les enfants du docteur Gachet

1949, accepté par l'Etat à titre de don de Paul et Marguerite Gachet pour le Museum of Jeu de Paume, Paris, France(comité du 28/04/1949, arrêté du 05/05/1949)

1949, attribué au Museum du Louvre, Paris

de 1949 à 1986, Musée du Louvre, galerie du Jeu de Paume, Paris

1986, affecté au Musée d'Orsay, Paris



Portrait of Doctor Gachet

Date: June 1890

Type: Oil on canvas
Dimensions: 67.0 x 56.0 cm

Location: Unknown, Private Collection


Van Gogh's sister-in-law originally sold the work in 1897 for 300 francs (around $58). After several changes of hand, it found its way to Germany, acquired in 1911 by Frankfurt's Städtische Galerie. The painting hung there until the spring of 1933–and the rise of Hitler–when the prescient museum director removed Gachet and several German Expressionist paintings and locked them in a hidden room. Not long after, the Nazis condemned such modern works as "degenerate art" and set about confiscating them; they finally tracked down Gachet in 1937. Within a year, party higher-up Hermann Goering–whom writer Saltzman calls "one of history's most rapacious art thieves"–sold the work for some $53,000 to buy politically acceptable hunting tapestries. The painting soon changed hands again, ending up with the Kramarsky family in Amsterdam, who brought it along when they fled the Nazis and came to New York. They often lent the work to the Metropolitan Museum, and in 1990 put it up for auction.

On May 15, 1990 his Portrait of Doctor Gachet (June 1890) debuted in front of a packed salesroom at Christie's auction house in New York. The bidding started at a respectable $20 million and rose swiftly in increments of $1

million, as if would-be buyers were proffering Monopoly money. 48 million, 49 million, 50 million . . . . The room erupted in shouts and applause; bidding was furious. The gavel finally came down, making art-world history. The painting was sold for $82.5 million in a matter of 3 minutes to Ryoei Saito, Japan's second-largest paper manufacturer. This sale established a new price record.

Japanese industrialist Ryoei Saito, spent a few hours with his purchase, then locked it in a climate-controlled vault. And there it stayed, untouched and unseen, for seven years–a symbol of the once highflying art market and the commoditization of such works.

While the painting rested in its hiding place, Saito struggled, financially and otherwise. In 1993, he was charged with trying to bribe officials to allow the development of a golf course, which, ironically, was to be named Vincent. Wheel-chair bound and broke, Saito pleaded guilty and received a three-year suspended sentence. During this time, he scandalized the art world by stating that he wanted van Gogh's masterpiece cremated and buried with him upon his death–though he later said he was joking.

No one was laughing, however, after his death in 1996. It wasn't clear who owned Gachet–Saito's heirs, his company, or his creditors–or even where it was. Museum curators and auction houses tried to locate it. But while representatives of Saito's company assured the world that it was still around, a veil of secrecy shrouded all future transactions. Gachet simply seemed to vanish into the murky waters of the international art market.

he sad, swirling Gachet, who wears what van Gogh called "the heartbroken expression of our time," has almost certainly left Japan for a private collection. The person who owns it is just not interested in advertising the fact, most likely because of all the notoriety. But where is it? Some say New York, some France, some Switzerland.



The Red Vineyard

Date: November 4, 1888

Type: Oil on canvas

Dimensions: 75 cm × 93 cm (29.5 in × 36.6 in)

Location: Pushkin Museum of Fine Arts, Moscow

Van Gogh painted this work completely from memory after an evening stroll past a vineyard. The dominant colors of red and yellow exemplify how he disregarded the established laws of contrasting color theory with magnificent results.

The only painting Vincent van Gogh is known to have sold during his lifetime. The Red Vineyard was exhibited for the first time at the annual exhibition of Les XX in 1890 in Brussels, and sold for 400 Francs (equal to about $$1,000-1,050 today) to impressionist painter Anna Boch. It was acquired by the famous Russian collector Sergei Shchukin, then nationalized with the rest of his works and moved to the Pushkin Museum of Fine Arts in Moscow.


The Starry Night

Date: 1889

Type: Oil on canvas

Dimensions: 73.7 cm × 92.1 cm (29 in × 36¼ in)

Location: Museum of Modern Art, New York City (acquired in 1941)

The painting depicts the view outside his sanatorium room window at night, although it was painted from memory during the day. The center part shows the village of St Remy under a swirling sky, in a view from the asylum towards north.

Starry Night is one of the most well known images in modern culture as well as being one of the most replicated and sought after prints. There are actually several main aspects that intrigue those who view this image, and each factor affects each individual differently. The aspects will be described below:

1. There is the night sky filled with swirling clouds, stars ablaze with their own luminescence, and a bright crescent moon. Although the features are exaggerated, this is a scene we can all relate to, and also one that most individuals feel comfortable and at ease with. This sky keeps the viewer's eyes moving about the painting, following the curves and creating a visual dot to dot with the stars. This movement keeps the onlooker involved in the painting while the other factors take hold.

2. Below the rolling hills of the horizon lies a small town. There is a peaceful essence flowing from the structures. Perhaps the cool dark colors and the fiery windows spark memories of our own warm childhood years filled with imagination of what exists in the night and dark starry skies. The center point of the town is the tall steeple of the church, reigning largely over the smaller buildings. This steeple casts down a sense of stability onto the town, and also creates a sense of size and seclusion.

3. To the left of the painting there is a massive dark structure that develops an even greater sense of size and isolation. This structure is magnificent when compared to the scale of other objects in the painting. The curving lines mirror that of the sky and create the sensation of depth in the painting. This structure also allows the viewer to interpret what it is. From a mountain to a leafy bush, the analysis of this formation is wide and full of variety.

Tuesday, January 18, 2011

John Singer Sargent - Home Fields (1885)


The Painting:


Home Fields (1885)



Early in the summer of 1885, after several years in Paris, Sargent returned to England. He spent the summer in the Cotswold village of Broadway, in Worcestershire, for a summer retreat for a group of young British and American artists.



Sargent found the artistic climate of Broadway a relief after the uncertainties and strictures of his career as a portraitist, and he relished the freedom of landscape painting. Home Fields, was painted during that summer, it is clear evidence of Sargent’s increasing interest in Impressionism. He would paint outdoors, setting his easel down anywhere, painting without previous conceptions or planning.

The fence in the foreground is rendered in a series of ragged rush-strokes, leading the eye to a shimmering patchwork of greens, oranges, and blue-greys. The concern with the effects of light and the bright-hued palette places the painting squarely in the context of Impressionism.


WHY is this painting important? John Singer Sargent felt a sense of freedom and had a passion for landscape paintings. It was a way for him to escape the world of portrait painting. But, relatively few of Sargent's landscapes survive. He would often paint over his landscape sketches as soon as the paint was dry. The painting Home Fields (c1885) was given to Sargents friend and English artist Frank Bramley, inscribed and signed bottom left: To my friend Bramley/John S. Sargent.


Artist:

John Singer Sargent



(January 12, 1856 – April 14, 1925)


John Singer Sargent was the 2nd child of Fitzwilliam Sargent, an eye doctor from Philadelphia and Mary Newbold Singer, both of whom were American Citizens. John’s older sister died when she was two years old and his mother wanted to move abroad to recover. Fitzwilliam and Mary would travel regularly with the seasons to the sea and the mountain resorts in France, Germany, Italy, and Switzerland. John Singer Sargent was born in Florence, Italy on January 12, 1856.


From his early youth, John Sargent showed evidence of his gift in art as he kept sketchbooks recording his family’s travels. At thirteen, his mother reported that John "sketches quite nicely, & has a remarkably quick and correct eye. If we could afford to give him really good lessons, he would soon be quite a little artist." At age thirteen, he received some watercolor lessons in Rome from Carl Welsch, a German landscape painter. He received instruction in the private studio of Carolus Duran, a fashionable Parisian portrait artist, whose elegance and dashingly fluid manner made an impression on his student. In 1874, on the first attempt, Sargent passed a rigorous exam and gained admission to the Eccole des Beaux-Arts, a prestigious Art School in Paris, he also spent much of his free time in free study, drawing in museums and painting in a studio he shared. He is described as ‘an American born in Italy, educated in France, who looks like a German, speaks like an Englishman, and paints like a Spaniard’ (William Starkweather, ‘The Art of John S. Sargent’, October 1924). Sargent was fluent in French, Italian, and German.


His technique followed the tradition of Diego Velazquez (whom he deeply admired) and Manet, with the VIRTUOSO brush-stroke, painting directly with a loaded brush and utilizing instead of concealing the brush marks. His early passion was for Ladscapes, bur with Duran’s influence in portraits, Sargent followed that path. Portrait painting, on the other hand, was the best way of promoting an art career, getting exhibited in the Salon, and gaining commissions to earn a livelihood.


After a trip to Spain, Sargent became entranced with Spanish music and dance. The trip also re-awakened his own talent for music, which was nearly equal to his artistic talent. Music would continue to play a major part in his social life as well, as he was a skillful accompanist of both amateur and professional musicians. By the time John Sargent was 22 he had gained an honorable mention in the Salon of 1878.




The portrait of Madame Pierre Gautreau, (Madam X) exhibited at the Salon of 1884, was what secured his fame with the scandal that it was to be provocative and erotic in character. This painting is now considered to be one of his best works, and is the Artists personal favorite (as he stated in 1915). The model was a well-known professional beauty and Sargent exploited her candid worldliness in his daring manner. Madame Gautreau’s mother wrote to Sargent asking him to withdraw the portrait that she said made her daughter a laughing-stock. This scandal persuaded Sargent to move to London where he remained for the rest of his life.


His fine manners, perfect French, and great skill made him a standout among the newer portraitists, and his fame quickly spread. He confidently set high prices and turned down unsatisfactory sitters. With high society clamoring to be painted, Sargent was basking in his fame as the most brilliant of the American turn-of-the-century painters. His paintings are described as if he held up a mirror to the rich so that ‘looking at his portraits, they understood at last how rich they really were’. Sargent's best portraits reveal the individuality and personality of the sitters. After securing a commission through negotiations which he carried out himself, Sargent would visit the client's home to see where the painting was to hang. He would often review a client's wardrobe to pick suitable attire. Some portraits were done in the client's home, but more often in his studio, which was well-stocked with furniture and background materials he chose for proper effect.

In 1897 he was elected to the National Academy in New York, The Royal Academy in London, and made an officer of the Legion d’Honneur in Paris. He was traveling to America to paint portraits for people and in 1890, while there he agreed to paint series of murals for the Boston Public Library.


Sargent wanted to abandon the compromising activity of portrait painting, but portraits and the murals he did in America is what he is most commonly known for. Landscapes is where Sargent’s passion was because he felt a freedom. Sargent is usually thought of as an Impressionist painter. As Monet later stated, "He is not an Impressionist in the sense that we use the word, he is too much under the influence of Carolus-Duran.” He spent much time painting outdoors in the English countryside.


During his career, he created roughly 900 oil paintings and more than 2,000 watercolors, as well as countless sketches and charcoal drawings.


Sargent died in April 1925 in London. He had achieved such distinction in society that he had a memorial service in Westminster Abbey.



Current Location:

Detroit Institute of Art

Detroit, Michigan



Date c. 1885

Medium Oil on Canvas

Dimensions 28 3/4 x 38 in. / 73.0 x 96.5 cm

Provenance John Singer Sargent to Frank Bramley, Worcestershire, England, until 1920

sold at Christie's London, May 28, 1920, lot 131

M. Knoedler & Co., New York, 1920 (lot no. 15064)

John Levy Galleries, New York, May 1921 DIA in 1921.



So, I am not really interested in making a trip to Detroit to see Home Fields in person, however I am interested in making a trip out to Cotswold village of Broadway, in Worcestershire,UK to see the actual place Sargent was inspired to paint this Landscape while at the Artist Retreat. Maybe it is because I fell in love with the beauty and history over there this past summer while in Ireland.


Rembrandt van Rijn - The Night Watch (1642)

Painting:


TITLE: De Nachtwacht (The Night Watch)

This painting was completed in 1642, at the peak of the Dutch Golden Age when paintings were not titled. It was not given the name “Night Watch” until the 18th century. Unfortunately, both "Night" and " "Watch" are wrong. The civic guards who are depicted had, by the time Rembrandt painted them, become quite pacific; living during a relatively peaceful time in Dutch history and were more of a fraternal organization than real crime fighters or cops. It was no longer necessary for them to defend the ramparts of Amsterdam or to go out on watches by night or by day. Their meetings had been diverted chiefly to social or sporting purposes; it is said that the particular destination in the painting for these guardsmen, is perhaps to march into the streets to take part in a parade."Night" is even less apt than "Watch." When the critics and the public attached that word to the painting, the canvas had become so darkened by dirt and layers of varnish that it was difficult to tell whether the illumination Rembrandt had provided in it came from the sun or moon. Not until after the end of World War II (1945) was the painting fully restored so that the viewer could get an idea of the brightness it had when it left Rembrandt's hand more than 300 years before. The title “Night Watch” has been kept out of familiarity. The painting may be more properly titled The Company of Frans Banning Cocq and Willem van Ruytenburch.


The very men who are portrayed in the painting commissioned “The Night Watch”.

This depicts Captain Frans Banning Conq and his company inside a large vaulted hall, which was used for their guild meetings. The city civil guards were comprised mainly of volunteers. Their tasks were to maintain order within the city walls, act as a fire brigade and in times of war to defend the city against enemy attack. They were an organized association under the patronage of a saint. The members had to provide for their own uniforms and arms. The guards would practice their skills at shooting on the Doelen (a field outside the city walls on the east). Amsterdam had become a prosperous and fast growing city. It benefited greatly from the Eighty Years War (1568-1648). Although Amsterdam was rich, it also ment there were plenty of poor. The city’s authorities prevented the poor from becoming members of the guards by ruling that every guard had to earn an annual income of 600 guilders or more. Nevertheless, the city’s authorities were regularly faced with complaints about disorderly behaviour in public by drunken civil guards, as they were notorious for their parties. Membership of one of civil guards companies meant social prestige and political power for the merchants from the second district of Amsterdam. 18 members of the guards under the command of Frans Banning each paid Rembrandt 100 guilders to become immortalized in paint. The two officers, Banning and Ruijtenburch, probably paid more.


Apparently, the company of Captain Frans Banning Conq was a merry band of comrades, they were very proud of their achievements as they had commissioned other paintings of themselves by other artists. In this way, we may think of the Night Watch as a magnificent class photo. Doubtless the guardsmen expected a group portrait in which each member would be clearly recognizable, although perhaps

not of equal prominence; it was often the practice for less affluent or junior members of a group to be represented only by heads or partial figures, for which they paid less than did those who were portrayed full length. Each member paid one hundred guilders for a total of 1,600 guilders for the commission of the painting (converts to the purchasing power of $51,793 USD in 2010). Many of the archer's guild who gave Rembrandt the commission would not pay their share because their faces were not plainly seen.


This painting is known for 3 KEY ELEMENTS:

1. Its SIZE (11’10” x 14’4”)

2. Use of LIGHT and SHADOW (chiaroscuro)

3. Perception of MOTION



SIZE: Rembrandt painted “The Night Watch” on a scaffold in the back yard of his home, because it was too big to lean against a wall of one of the rooms in the house. (13’x16’) It was also painted solely by the master himself without the help of one of his many pupils.


LIGHT & SHADOW: "The Night Watch" is a masterful work of chiaroscuro, or light into dark, that gives what might be a boring class picture a lot of drama and movement. Light can be seen throughout this picture, but is brightest at the center. Diagonal lines from the lances and banners help further move the eye to the center of the work where two figures Captain Banning Conq (in black and red) and his lieutenant, Willem van Ruijtenberg (yellow) are emphasized with light and color. The shadow of the officer’s hand falls across from the left. The light, which comes from very high, unseen windows at the left falls unevenly in shafts on the other figures in the picture. Several, including a young woman and drummer, are brightly illuminated, while others are barely visible in the shadows. Rembrant was skilled in handling light for dramatic effect (a main characteristic of the Baroque style). He regulated and manipulated light-opening or closing the shutters in his studio-for his own purpose, which was to create an atmosphere both dreamlike and dramatic.


MOTION: Rembrant took a radical approach to the group portrait (militia companies were usually portrayed in static ranks facing the viewer, somewhat like a school class photograph) by dramatizing the scene by picturing a moment when the order has just been given for the guardsmen to get organized to go out for a parade. It was by far the most revolutionary painting Rembrandt had yet made, transforming the traditional Dutch group portrait into a dazzling blaze of light, color and motion, and subordinating the requirements of orthodox portraiture to a far larger, more complex but still unified whole. There is a flurry and bustle of activity; some men are loading their muskets, some shoulder their spears, the drummer beats his drum, and the leaders stroll forward towards the viewer. The effect on the viewer is direct; he feels that he had best get out of the way. In the midst of this commotion, two boys and a little girl in a sparkling yellow dress scamper about and a small dog dances with excitement.

Rembrandt organized all this random activity and movement with the subtle manipulation of color harmonies, light and compositional accents. The main color harmonies of red and yellow draw the attention immediately to the two central foreground figures. These colors are repeated in the red uniforms of the two musketeers flanking the central figures and in the yellow dress of the little girl. Lances, swords, and muskets held aslant are further unifying devices, providing diagonal accents across the composition.


Artist:

Rembrandt Harmenszoon (son of Harmen) van Rijn

(July 15, 1606 – October 4, 1669)


Rembrandt was a Dutch Artist, born in Leyden, Holland.

His father, Harmen was a miller and added the words ‘van Rijn’ to the end of his name as an illusion to his mill near the Rhine River, and his mother, was a baker’s daughter, they were respected members of the lower middle class. They had nine children (only 4 lived to maturity). Rembrandt was the ninth child born to his parents and the fourth living child. It was determined that he should be a learned man and they gave him a superb education so he could belong to one of the honoured professions, such as law. At 7 years old, Rembrant was sent to the Latin School in Lendyn and in 1620 (when he was 14 yrs old) he was enrolled in university. A year after beginning university however, he was allowed to forsake the academic world and enter a 3-year apprenticeship to Jacob van Swanenburgh who was a mediocre artist who taught Rembrant the skill of etching. Rembrant probably learned more of the basics of his craft from Pieter Lastman a far more competent and cosmopolitan artist with whom he studied with later, this is when he began painting biblical scenes as Lastman studied in Italy.

This is a self portrait of Rembrant with his wife Saskia van Ulenburg. She was the daughter of an aristocrat, who was refined and rich. He met her through her cousin, who was an art dealer who had ordered Rembrandt to paint a portrait of his dainty cousin. Rembrant and Saskia lived in a home on the quay of the River Amstel in Amsterdam. They had four children, three of which died shortly after birth. In 1641 they had a fourth child, a son, whom they called Titus (1641-1668). Saskia died soon after in 1642.

In 1645, Hendrickje Stoffels, (who had initially been Rembrandt's maidservant), moved in with him. In 1654 this brought him an official reproach from the church for 'living in sin'. In that same year the couple had a daughter, Cornelia. Rembrandt lived above his means, buying lots of art pieces, costumes (often used in his paintings) and rarities, which caused his bankruptcy in 1656. He had to sell his house and move to a more modest accommodation on the Rozengracht. Here his wife Hendrickje and son Titus started an art shop to make ends meet. Rembrandt's fame waned in these years, only be restored in later years. Rembrandt outlived Hendrickje and his son Titus. In the end only his daughter Cornelia was at his side. He died October 4, 1669 in Amsterdam, living in poverty and was buried in an unknown grave in the Westerkerk (one of the oldest churches in the Netherlands)

This is the house where Rembrandt lived between 1639 and 1658, it is now a museum. Built in 1606 it is a house of brick and cut stone, four stories high. The purchase price of the home in 1639 was 13,000 guilders, (converts to the purchasing power of $411,732 USD in 2010), this was a huge sum of money, which he could not come up with in its entirety. He was, however, allowed to pay it off in installments. His income was rather large for those times. He was a most industrious worker, then painting forty pictures in a year. He was famous for painting Landscapes, Portraits and Biblical Scenes. He has 50-60 Self-portraits. Here are a few of them:


For his half-length portraits he received five hundred guilders, for his scriptural subjects as much as 1,200 guilders. Rembrandt was unable—or unwilling—to pay off the mortgage. This was eventually to bring about his financial downfall. Between 1652 and 1656 Rembrandt made frantic attempts to get his hands on money to pay off his debt. He did not succeed and was forced into bankruptcy. In 1656 Rembrandt’s property was inventoried for the benefit of his creditors, and his household effects and collection of art and curiosities were sold. The house was auctioned in 1658 and fetched something over eleven thousand guilders. Rembrandt moved to a small rented house on the Rozengracht, where he lived until his death in 1669.




Who is in it?



The militiamen in the Night Watch were called Arquebusiers after the arquebus, a sixteenth-century long-barrelled gun. Rembrandt worked the traditional emblem of the Arquebusiers into the painting.

01. Captain Frans Banning Cocq (dressed in black, with a red sash) – He eventually became burgomaster (mayor) of the city of Amsterdam for the first time in 1650, he studied law in France and married Maria Overlander (from the rich Banning family) She was the only surviving child of Volckert Overlander – merchant, ship owner, knight, one of the founders of the Dutch East Trading Company and burgomaster of Amsterdam. Upon his father-in-laws death, Banning Conq inherited his properties north of Amsterdam, along with the title of Lord of Purmerend and

Ilpendam.


02. Lieutenant Willem van Ruytenburch (dressed in yellow, with a white sash) – Lesser in rank than Frans Banning Conq, but his wealth is stressed by the richness of the yellow color of his clothing. He came from a family of storekeepers. In 1642, he became a schepen (councilor). He owned a place on Herenracht in Amsterdam and his family bought an estate near the city of Vlaardingen.


03. Musketeer loading his weapon - wearing a helmet with an oak leaf, a traditional motif of the Arquebusiers.


04. Ensign (flag) bearer, Jan Visscher Cornelissen - the company's colors are carried by him. He would be a main figure at the ceremonies and parades, therefore had to be young, strong and handsome. Because of the vulnerable position of flag-bearer in times of war he was also requested to remain a bachelor. Jan Cornelisz Visscher never married. He came from a rich merchant family. He lived with his mother and grandmother at the Nieuwezijds Achterburgwal spending his family’s fortune on books and art. He was a bachelor with a passion for art and

music. He died in 1650 at the age of forty, without ever having been near a battlefield and having lived a life of leisure.


05. Sergeant Rombout Kemp – he was a merchant in linen, the dean of the Dutch Reformed Church and regent of the poorhouses of Amsterdam. As befitted his social position in society, he is dressed in black with a white collar.


06. Drummer, Jacob Jorisz


07. Boy


08. Girl in yellow dress with chicken - Rembrant’s wife, Saskia died in 1642 and her features are painted on this girls face. She is carrying the main symbols and is a mascot herself:

the claws of a dead chicken on her belt represent the clauweniers (arquebusiers);

dead chicken is also meant to represent a defeated adversary.

the pistol behind the chicken stands for 'clover';

she is holding the militia's goblet.

The color yellow is associated with victory. (Holand’s Victory over the Spanish)


09. Musketeer

10. Herman Wormskerck – merchant in linen
11. Jacob Dircksen de Roy - one of the early governors of the city’s theater
12. Musketeer
13. Musketeer
14. Musketeer
15. Eldest Musketeer
16. Sergeant, Rijer Engelen - Merchant in linen

17. Musketeer
18. Musketeer
19. Musketeer
20. Musketeer in conversation with Kemp (05)


Rembrandt painted himself as well in this scene. A part of his face emerges behind the shoulder of the pikesman on the back of the painting who holds up his pike. Pointing towards Sergeant Rombout Kemp. Rembrandt seems to be standing under the archway on his toes, trying to have a better look at his own painting.



Current Location:


The Night Watch was commissioned for and first hung in the Kloveniersdoelen, the headquarters of the civic guardsmen, and in 1715 it was moved to the Amsterdam town hall, but no doubt for reasons of space, the painting was cut down on all four sides. The greatest loss was on the left, where a strip about two feet wide, containing three figures, was removed.


In 1817 the Night Watch was moved to the newly opened Rijksmuseum Museum and is where it is still located today. The painting has only once been removed from its present location and that was during the Second World War, when it was rolled up and stored in a bunker. It is a large painting taking up the entire back wall - and is arguably one of the most impressive paintings displayed there.


The prized quality of the Nightwatch has made it vulnerable to attack, to date there are three incidents of vandalism. January 13, 1911, a disgruntled Navy cook named Sigrist, angered by his discharge from the service, went into the Museum and badly slashed the masterpiece with a knife. He said he vandalized the painting as an act of vengeance against the state for discharging him. In 1975, the worst vandalism occurred, was slashed with a butter knife by a psychic leaving large pieces of canvas lying on the museum floor. It took about 6 months to restore the painting. In 1990, a man attacked the painting by throwing acid on it, but thanks to quick and adequate reaction from the guards the damage was limited to just the varnish. (The same man who did the 1990 attack cut and severely damaged a Picasso in another Amsterdam museum in January 2004).


The Rijksmuseum National Museum

Amsterdam, Netherlands

Rembrandtplein Square

The city renamed a square, in Amsterdam after Rembrandt in 1852, it is now called Rembrandtplein, it has a statue of the Netherlands' most famous artist, Rembrandt van Rijn, commissioned by sculptor Louis Royer.

In 2006, the 400th anniversary of Rembrandt's birth, the city added to the square 22 bronze figures that make up a three-dimensional replica of the artist's most famous masterpiece, The Night Watch.


I really hope I have the chance to walk through this life size replica of this painting that I have now learned WAY TO MUCH about.